Home >
Employer-generated complaints to the statutory registration authority: The regulatory framework for the supervision of employed health professionals in the South African public sector >
Reader Comments >
FinTech Mining
CONTACT THE EDITOR
Professor Ames Dhai
This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy. Our Journals: South African Medical Journal | African Journal of Health Professions Education | South African Journal of Bioethics and Law | South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care | Strenghtening Health Systems |
FinTech Mining
by Daisy Pricilla (2019-02-15)
At present, we are researching the best way to resend FinTech Mining Review these transactions. We will probably zap the transactions at an off-peak time, although we want to itemise all the transactions we think should be zapped beforehand, which will take some time. One simple technique to decrease the chances of malleability being an issue is to have your Bitcoin node to connect to as many other nodes as possible. That way, you will be "shouting" your new transaction out and getting it popular very quickly, which will likely mean that any mutated transaction will get drowned out and rejected first. There are some nodes out there that have anti-mutation code in already. These are able to detect mutated transactions and only pass on the validated transaction. It is useful to connect to trusted nodes like this, and worth considering implementing. All of these malleability issues will not be a problem once the BIP 62 enhancement to Bitcoin is implemented, which will make malleability impossible. This unfortunately is some way off and there is no reference implementation at present, let alone a plan for migration to a new block type.
https://criptomonde.com/fintech-mining-review/