Review

Public health emergency preparedness and response in South Africa: A review of recommendations for legal reform relating to data and biological sample sharing

M Steytler, D W Thaldar

Abstract


COVID-19 exposed flaws in the law regulating the sharing of data and human biological material (HBM). This poses obstacles to the epidemic response, which needs accelerated public health research and, in turn, efficient and legitimate HBM and data sharing. Legal reform and development are needed to ensure that HBM and data are shared efficiently and lawfully. Academics have suggested important legal reforms. The first is the clarification of the susceptibility of HBM and HBM derivatives to ownership, including, inter alia, the promulgation of a revised version of the South African Material Transfer Agreement (SA MTA) by the Minister of Health. This would remove uncertainty regarding the current SA MTA’s perpetual donor ownership clause. The second is the development of data trusts, the adoption of open access to research data, and the creation of an African ‘data corridor’. This would ensure that data are protected while allowing for the efficient transfer of data between researchers for the collective good and in the interest of the public. The third is the amendment of the Space Affairs Act to extend the powers of the Council of Space Affairs to include the management of data collected through the utilisation of Earth observation and geographical information systems. This would ensure the protection of outer space data, legislating its use and sharing once it lands on Earth. The implementation of these legal reforms and developments will better prepare SA to face future epidemics from a health research perspective.


Authors' affiliations

M Steytler, School of Law, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

D W Thaldar, School of Law, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (124KB)

Cite this article

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 2021;14(3):101. DOI:10.7196/SAJBL.2021.v14i3.772

Article History

Date submitted: 2022-01-28
Date published: 2022-01-28

Article Views

Abstract views: 1955
Full text views: 1648

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here