Articles
Workload of a South African University-based Health Research Ethics Committee in 2003 and 2007.
Abstract
Methods: Minutes and database records of all applications processed by the Committee in 2003 and 2007 were examined.
Results: General research applications increased from 439 to 553 in 2007 while clinical trial proposals declined from 102 to 86. Some 60-70% of applications required revision; 77 - 81% of general research applications were eventually approved and 86% - 97% of clinical trials.
Conclusion: The work load puts an increasingly heavy burden on HREC(M) members and support staff.
Authors' affiliations
Peter Cleaton-Jones, Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, University of the Witwatersrand
Merryl Vorster, Deanery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand
Full Text
PDF (264KB)Keywords
Cite this article
Article History
Date published: 2008-12-12
Article Views
Full text views: 2775
Comments on this article
*Read our policy for posting comments hereby Bima Payung (2017-06-12)
"Shankar Kumar" (2017-08-14)
by Letici Souza Fernandes (2018-11-30)
by Letici Souza Fernandes (2018-11-30)